Europäische Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft




Erfolgreich durch internationale Zusammenarbeit

OPHTALMOLOGY

Cite as: Archiv EuroMedica. 2024. 14; 2: e1. DOI 10.35630/2024/14/2.212

Received 10 April 2024;
Accepted 26 April 2024;
Published 29 April 2024

Inferior Rectus Fibrosis and Residual Diplopia following Sclerotherapy for Orbital Venous Malformation

Aleza A Andron1 email orcid id logo, Akshay Gopinathan Nair2 orcid id logo,
Adam Farkas3, Elena Drabkin1 orcid id logo

1 Oculoplastic Unit, Ophthalmology Department Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
2 Consultant of Oculoplastic Surgery and Ocular Oncology, Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital Wadala, Mumbai
3 Invasive Radiologist, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

download article (pdf)

  dralezaandron@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Orbital vascular lesions are challenging to treat and observation is often preferred if symptoms are mild. Historically, surgical excision of the lesions used to be the preferred treatment, but intraoperative bleeding and incomplete removal were common. Therefore, sclerotherapy has become the treatment of choice by virtue of being minimally invasive and extremely effective. Sclerotherapy involves multiple intralesional injections of sclerosing agents like bleomycin and sodium tetradecyl sulfate. In this communication, we describe an unusual complication associated with sclerotherapy to treat an orbital venous malformation in a young woman diagnosed with a type-2 low flow venous malformation (orbital varices) in her left orbit. There was complete resolution of the lesion. However, following the procedure, she complained of diplopia accompanied by left hypotropia. The condition persisted six months after the procedure. Forced duction test confirmed a tight inferior rectus and she refused any further intervention. This case report discusses the possible mechanisms of this rare and unusual complication associated with sclerotherapy while treating orbital vascular lesions.

Keywords: Orbit, Vascular Lesion, sclerotherapy, venous malformation

INTRODUCTION

Orbital vascular malformations (OVM) are a rare but challenging group of vascular anomalies that can lead to significant morbidity if not appropriately managed. OVM are typically classified depending on their hemodynamic flow. Low-flow OVM are characterized by slow-flowing venous channels lined by thin-walled endothelial cells, whereas high-flow OVM are characterized by arteriovenous shunting and thick-walled vessels.[1,2]

Low flow OVM can usually be treated with sclerotherapy, a minimally invasive technique that involves the injection of a sclerosant agent into the venous malformation. The sclerosant causes fibrosis and eventual occlusion. Historically, many liquid based sclerosants such as ethanol, bleomycin, sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) and pingyangmycin among others have been effectively used for treating orbital vascular malformations.[3,4] Sclerotherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for low flow OVM, with high success rates and low complication rates.[1,5]  

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old woman presented to the Oculoplastics Unit with a 2-year history of left eye fullness and pressure while bending (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Clinical photo on presentation demonstrating hypoglobus and superior sulcus defect on the left side

Figure 1: Clinical photo on presentation demonstrating hypoglobus and superior sulcus defect on the left side

Her symptoms began and increased during her second pregnancy. She was not pregnant at the time of presentation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Gadolinium and fat suppression revealed a large vascular lesion in the left orbit (Figures 2a,b).

Figure 2a: Axial MR T1 with contrast demonstrating intra and extraconal orbital lesion

Figure 2a: Axial MR T1 with contrast demonstrating intra and extraconal orbital lesion

Figure 2b: Sagital MR T1 demonstrating left inferior orbital lesion

Figure 2b: Sagital MR T1 demonstrating left inferior orbital lesion

An endoscopic biopsy was performed and pathology revealed a low flow venous malformation. The patient was about to begin a round of fertility treatments soon. When discussed with her treating physician, there was a suspicion that excessive hormones and pregnancy could potentially cause an increase in the size of this lesion. Additionally, if needed, surgical intervention may not be possible due to the risks associated with advanced pregnancy. After some deliberation, it was decided to treat the lesion with sclerotherapy. Sodium tetradecyl was injected percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance into the lesion in an uneventful procedure. (Figure 3)

Figure 3: Sclerotherapy – showing sclerosing agent in the vessels of the lesion

Figure 3: Sclerotherapy – showing sclerosing agent in the vessels of the lesion

Following the procedure, the patient complained of diplopia in primary position with restriction of upgaze. The patient was treated with oral steroids with no improvement. MRI was 2 months post procedure, there was excellent anatomical improvement, with significant decrease of the lesion but with enlargement of the inferior rectus (Figures 4 a,b,c).

Figure 4a: Axial MR T2: resolution of lesion

Figure 4a: Axial MR T2: resolution of lesion

Figure 4b: Sagital MR T1: demonstrating thickening of inferior rectus in left

Figure 4c: Coronal MR T2: Complete resolution of lesion

Figure 4c: Coronal MR T2: Complete resolution of lesion

At her last follow up 6 months post sclerotherapy there was still significant primary position diplopia and the patient refused further suggested treatment including prisms and strabismus consult (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Clinical photo post sclerotherapy demonstrating left hypoglobus

Figure 5: Clinical photo post sclerotherapy demonstrating left hypoglobus

DISCUSSION

STS has been shown to be very effective as a sclerosant agent. STS is a synthetic surfactant with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as a sclerosing agent.[6] Intravenous injection of STS incites intimal inflammation and thrombus formation. This leads to obliteration and occlusion of the lumen. The resultant fibrous tissue causes venous obliteration. STS has been used in the treatment of orbital varices and other low flow vascular malformations as well. [7] In our case, even though the fluoroscopic guidance was used during the procedure to secure the position of the catheter through which the sclerosant was injected, we postulate that some amount of the sclerosant may have extravasated outside of the lumen of the vessels and come in contact with the surrounding tissue in the vicinity of the inferior rectus.

When used in the treatment of superficial vascular malformations, it has been reported that extravasation of the sclerosant leads to skin necrosis.[8] While it is possible that introduction of the needle itself could have damaged the inferior rectus muscle, we believe that an inadvertent extravasation of STS from within the injection VLM – outside in the orbit could have incited an inflammatory reaction leading to localized focal necrosis. The resultant myositis and subsequent resolution of inflammation may have led to scarring and resultant shortening of the inferior rectus muscle. The forced duction test performed subsequently, confirmed the presence of a tight inferior rectus muscle helped us out a neurological component and it possibly validates the above explained scenario. Oral corticosteroids were given as a part of the post-operative treatment regimen and this could have helped in limiting the damage.

Extraocular muscle damage and fibrosis or damage has not been described as a complication of using sclerosants for OVM. While fluoroscopic visualization can help in precise injection of the sclerosant; local extravasation remains a distinct possibility and clinicians should be aware of rare and unusual complication of EOM fibrosis arising because of STS use within the orbit.

DISCLOSURE

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

There was no funding received for this research and writing of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. de Maria L, De Sanctis P, Tollefson M, Mardini S, Garrity JA, Morris PP, et al. Sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations of the orbital and periocular regions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol . 2020;65(1):41-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.08.003
  2. Li T, Jia R, Fan X. Classification and treatment of orbital venous malformations: an updated review. Front Med. 2019;13(5):547-555. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-018-0623-2
  3. Castren E, Aronniemi J, Klockars T, et al. Complications of sclerotherapy for 75 head and neck venous malformations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:1027e36. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3577-x
  4. Chen Y, Li Y, Zhu Q, Zeng Q, Zhao J, He X, Mei Q. Fluoroscopic intralesional injection with pingyangmycin lipiodol emulsion for the treatment of orbital venous malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:966e71. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2851
  5. Sio WS, Lee SH, Liang IC. Orbital infarction syndrome after multiple percutaneous sclerotherapy sessions for facial low-flow vascular malformation: A case report and literature review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016; 64(8): 595–597. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.191508
  6. Park H.S., Do Y.S., Park K.B. Clinical outcome and predictors of treatment response in foam sodium tetradecyl sulfate sclerotherapy of venous malformations. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(5):1301–1310. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3931-9
  7. Razavi ME, Rajabi MT, Narges H, Mohammadi SS. Sclerotherapy for eyelid and anterior orbital venous-lymphatic malformation. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019; 31(2): 214–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.002
  8. Kang M, Yang A, Hannaford P, Connor D, Parsi K. Skin necrosis following sclerotherapy. Part 1: Differential diagnosis based on classification of pathogenic mechanisms. Phlebology. 2022;37(6):409-424. DOI: 10.1177/02683555221088101


back



Europäische Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft